Christian scientist dating Free online hot nude girls chats
Which illustrates that, contrary to popular belief, the dating methods are not the primary way that ages are decided. Their results are always ‘interpreted’ to agree with other factors, such as the evolutionary interpretation of geology and fossils.If you were to read an article every day from this site it would take you 20 years to read them all.This water dropping into a cylinder - explanation to refute dating was quite "simple" indeed. beforehand there were others who found 2.61 and 3 mill..... at least one would then assume with some confidence it should have occured between 1 and 4 million years ago... All dating methods are based on assumptions about age, not measurements of age.Of course, the further you go back in history the greater your statistical errors will be... And you can make the result come out to anything you like depending on the assumptions that you make.Tests by other scientists using paleomagnetism and fission tracks confirmed the lower date.
Their result of 212–230 million years did not agree with the age of the fossils (elephant, pig, ape and tools) so they rejected the date.There is no 'scientific' method that could give us that knowledge.